
Political parties and lawyers gathered outside Geo TV offices in Islamabad on March 16 2007
A year ago, on this very day, members of the Punjab police attacked the Geo Television offices in Islamabad, as the Supreme Judicial Council was hearing the Chief Justice reinstatement case.
What followed has been written about ad infinitum, but it highlighted the question of how free Pakistani media actually was. I was at the Supreme Court when the news spread that our offices had been attacked, and for a second I wondered if we were actually living in the 21st century. To this day, no one has taken responsibility for ordering the attack.
For many years, the Pakistani media, initially the press and later the television networks have been struggling against censorship - whether it is in the form of censoring articles, or taking news channels off air. And despite the condemnation that follows, the Pakistani government - whether it was Zia, or Nawaz Sharif or Musharraf, have made it a policy of sorts to ensure that the media toes the official line, as convoluted as it may be.
Following the Emergency in Pakistan in October 2007, the media once again had to battle a new foe, the PEMRA ordinance, as all private news channels were taken off air.
President Musharraf often says that the media in Pakistan is irresponsible, and that he was the one responsible for giving them freedom in the first place. The absurdity of this statement makes me laugh sometimes - are we, the TV channel representatives, your slaves, that you can grant us freedom one minute, and take it away the next? As far as responsibility in news reporting goes - we will only learn that with time and experience - it is only now, 40 years after the first state channel started transmission, that we have a plethora of private news channels. We still don’t have a single educational program that focuses solely on teaching news reporting in the country. We make mistakes, and we learn, and we strive to do better. But if teaching us a lesson involves smashing equipment in offices and taking channels off air then this government and the future governments need to rethink their strategies. The use of brute force has never resulted in a happy ending.
blaming media to be a lapdog is utterly wrong...media men are just one of us and they have to mold the stories as per desired by the rulers. The same is done even in the democracies.
I have been following the online editions of the print media in Pakistan. I was actually pleasantly surprised to see the freedom they enjoyed. The picture of Pakistan outside is completely different. I would like to ask you how free is internet access in Pakistan.
I mean from your article, I didn't really get a true picture. can you please elaborate a bit on this?
Thank you.
Everything boils down to whether or not there is true democracy in a country or not. If the political parties in Pakistan grabs this golden opportunity to make Paksitan a democratic nation permanently I am sure the freedom of media will remain intact.
Hussam - The rules pertaining to the PEMRA ordinance are no longer in force - but there are the unspoken rules of the game - dos and don’ts which are sporadically issued. Then there are the underhand games - Aaj TV’s transmission was suspended last month for some time, channels applying for new licenses are being given a hard time, journalists are still facing harassment from some quarters. It may look rosy on the surface, but once you start working in the Pakistani media you realize how restricted the freedom actually is.
I can give you an example how it works in India. Recently the UPA government created pressure on two media organisations and forced it to remove two of its top Editors. First, it was the removal of M V Kamath from the Chairmanship of Prasar Bharati. Second, M J Akbar was removed from the Editorship of ’The Asian Age’ and ’Deccan Chronicle’.
It was a silent attack on freedom press by the democratically elected government in new Delhi and no one used force, guns and locks. This is being said that UPA Chairperson Ms. Sonia Gandhi is said to be behind it. Kamath and Akbar are two renowned journalists in Indian media and they became target without any ho-hallah.
What I am trying to say that press has two options - You can write what government want or sit tight with lips locked. You just can name one or two media organisation in the world working without any control from the government. But, You can see a national channel, like Lok Sabha TV in India, who can never show anti-government programs at any cost. Is this a press?
Local Opinions (1)
Hussam - The rules pertaining to the PEMRA ordinance are no longer in force - but there are the unspoken rules of the game - dos and don’ts which are sporadically issued. Then there are the underhand games - Aaj TV’s transmission was suspended last month for some time, channels applying for new licenses are being given a hard time, journalists are still facing harassment from some quarters. It may look rosy on the surface, but once you start working in the Pakistani media you realize how restricted the freedom actually is.
Global Opinions (8)
blaming media to be a lapdog is utterly wrong...media men are just one of us and they have to mold the stories as per desired by the rulers. The same is done even in the democracies.
I have been following the online editions of the print media in Pakistan. I was actually pleasantly surprised to see the freedom they enjoyed. The picture of Pakistan outside is completely different. I would like to ask you how free is internet access in Pakistan.
I mean from your article, I didn't really get a true picture. can you please elaborate a bit on this?
Thank you.
Everything boils down to whether or not there is true democracy in a country or not. If the political parties in Pakistan grabs this golden opportunity to make Paksitan a democratic nation permanently I am sure the freedom of media will remain intact.
I can give you an example how it works in India. Recently the UPA government created pressure on two media organisations and forced it to remove two of its top Editors. First, it was the removal of M V Kamath from the Chairmanship of Prasar Bharati. Second, M J Akbar was removed from the Editorship of ’The Asian Age’ and ’Deccan Chronicle’.
It was a silent attack on freedom press by the democratically elected government in new Delhi and no one used force, guns and locks. This is being said that UPA Chairperson Ms. Sonia Gandhi is said to be behind it. Kamath and Akbar are two renowned journalists in Indian media and they became target without any ho-hallah.
What I am trying to say that press has two options - You can write what government want or sit tight with lips locked. You just can name one or two media organisation in the world working without any control from the government. But, You can see a national channel, like Lok Sabha TV in India, who can never show anti-government programs at any cost. Is this a press?
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 










